A cross-border acquisition runs the same fundamental playbook as a domestic one — valuation, diligence, structuring, close — but several assumptions that are safe to make domestically stop being safe the moment a deal crosses a border.
Currency Risk Runs Through Everything
Should the valuation model be built in the target’s local currency or the acquirer’s reporting currency? Building in local currency and converting the final output avoids double-counting currency risk in the discount rate, but the choice of exchange rate forecast (spot, forward curve, or purchasing power parity-implied) can meaningfully move the answer — and needs to be applied consistently to both cash flows and the discount rate.
Country Risk Premiums
The discount rate for a target in an emerging or higher-risk market typically needs a country risk premium layered on top of the base cost of capital, reflecting sovereign risk, political instability, and less liquid capital markets. Getting this input from a credible, updated source matters — country risk isn’t static, and a premium calculated even a year or two ago may no longer reflect current conditions.
Comparable Company Selection Gets Harder
A guideline public company set built purely from the target’s home market may be too thin to be statistically meaningful, while a global comparable set introduces its own inconsistencies — different accounting standards, different market maturity, different growth expectations. Analysts often need to explicitly reconcile local accounting policies (IFRS vs. local GAAP variants) before multiples are genuinely comparable.
Tax and Repatriation
Withholding taxes on dividend repatriation, transfer pricing rules, and differing treatment of acquisition structures (asset vs. share purchase) across jurisdictions can materially affect the after-tax cash flows an acquirer actually receives — considerations that don’t exist in a purely domestic deal and require local tax advice early in the process, not as an afterthought at signing.
The Practical Takeaway
A cross-border valuation that simply plugs foreign financials into a domestic model template, without separately addressing currency, country risk, and cross-jurisdictional tax mechanics, is likely understating the real risk in the deal. These aren’t refinements — they’re structural inputs that change the answer.
Leave a comment